UNJUST  JUSTICE  ITALIAN -  THE MURDER OF LUCA TONELLO

Luca, you still had an infinity of things to realize in your life and, above all, to give us all: love, courtesy, cheerfulness, generosity. 
Unfortunately a woman you believed a friend and that you helped, led you, by treachery, in a dark and isolated place along the river Sile to harm you and since then you are missing in the life of those who loved you. 
The delight to have you near us left the place to despair and to such an immense pain that we are unable to explain with words. 
A piece of our hearts and our souls, are died with you in that cold night of October. 
We will miss you forever. 
With LOVE, for all the life. 
Your dear ones. 

LUCA TONELLO 



VERSIONE ITALIANA

MURDEREUS'S PHOTO

AN EXAMPLE OF SHAMELESS "BUONISMO" (unjust goodness) OF ITALIAN MAGISTRATURE, 
THAT INCREASED THE PAIN OF THE THE VICTIM'S RELATIVES, 
BECAUSE  JUSTICE, AT LEAST UP TO NOW, HAS NOT BEEN DONE?


Luca was murdered in the night of the 30 october 2000 in a dark and isolated place along the river Sile. 
His ex girl, Rossana Bertelli, led Luca there and her current boy friend, Alessandro Mandalà, assailed Luca from the rear and killed him, smashing his skull with several hits of mallet and stabbing him many times in the back.

By the first declarations of the two parties, by a Bertelli's letter and by the logic of the events, it resulted that the plan for the crime was studied between the 29 and 30 october and that the motive was to obtain some money for their fun, above all using Luca's automated banking card, whose secret code Bertelli knew (but they were not successful).

Luca's mather and the sister soffered an immense pain, that hit their spirits and constitutions hard and they needed that the Magistrature judged with correctness Bertelli. Instead, in their opinion, that didn't happen, therefore their pain increased and their spirit and constitution problems aggravated. 
In fact, according to the facts by which one can judge, Bertelli should have been sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment (with the possibility to be reduced to about 20 real years, by the several discounts of punishment, permissions to go out, etc., that the Italian law provides), that are however few for what she did. Instead she was sentenced to 16 years only, that in really was reduced to about 10 years. 

In the first level of judgment, this could be happened because the Public Prosecutor, among the aggravating circumstances disputed, didn't put the premeditation of which, instead, there was such an absolute certainty that even the Bertelli' defence admitted its existence?
In fact, during the preliminary hearing the advocate of Luca's mather, after having demonstrated its existence, has requested that the premeditation were put. But he was not granted.
Luca's mather complained about the Public Prosecutor's behavior, by sending a statement to the "Superior Council of Magistrature", that replied that it hasn't the authority to take measures, because that is a matter of censure of jurisdictional activity.
Since several years Luca's mather demands, from this web-site and from press, that someone should prove that her judgments isn't right, but nothing is arrived.

In the second level of judgment, this could be happened because the Judge, even if he didn't deny the premeditation, supposed the existence of some "clues" in favor of Bertelli that, in his opinion, would have balanced the aggravating circumstances, but that don't exist in the judicial deeds of the trial? 
Also in this case Luca's mather demands that someone should prove that her judgments isn't right.

She hopes, in any case, that THE MAGISTRATURE WILL EXPLAIN WHY THERE ISN'T THE PREMEDITATION, ALTHOUGH THAT: